-- Z --Before this position, which was not one of comfort, the Egyptians rejected it one after another. Therefore, we did not find in the Legislative Council a group that would assist the government in its work with acceptable discussions between one opinion and another. Rather, we found in it a group that harbored intense and deliberate enmity towards other groups in the ruling body – that is, towards the Council of Ministers and their advisors. This enmity surrounded their efforts, discouraged their resolve, and made work impossible for the government. The majority represented in it – if it can be said that such a majority existed – allowed themselves to be dominated and disdained by extremists. Thus, the Legislative Council failed to fulfill the function assigned to it by the organic law established by "Lord Duffin." The conclusion to be drawn from this is that the policy intended to govern Egypt by maintaining a constant vigilance of nationalists is not compatible with the policy aimed at stimulating efforts for the progress of what are called representative councils. One of these two policies must be chosen and prioritized over the other. The policy that should be chosen and prioritized is undoubtedly clear, even if we look at the underlying direction that aligns with the wishes of the governmental body itself. The ministers choose the most capable and knowledgeable Egyptians. They are more aware of the desires and true opinions of their countrymen than the members of a council that does not truly represent the trust of the wealthy beys and pashas and cannot resist any incitement from small groups with vested interests. Councils that truly represent the nation are not found in countries where only 6,000,000 out of eleven million people are literate. Some newspapers have criticized the changes explained above, claiming they indicate a shirking of responsibilities resulting from the occupation, especially following the aspirations of a people who are still beginning to acquire the qualities essential for self-governance. In reality, the changes that have occurred have not entirely displaced matters from their positions. If anything, they should have been approached with caution, vigilance, and carefulness. My opinion remains that Egyptians have demonstrated a capacity for intellect and understanding that enables them to appreciate the use of facilities granted to them to help manage their country's affairs. However, it cannot be denied that the recent experiment has failed, particularly concerning the Legislative Council and the General Assembly. The results derived from this experiment have not been in line with our intentions and goals. What, then, are the reasons for this? I believe the greatest reason, sufficient to explain the matter, was present from beginning to end.