Sudan Archive

Open the original scan

OriginalTranslateMachine translation — not a source document

The British Chamber of Commerce in Egypt views with concern and anxiety the lack of commercial security in Egypt, as this greatly affects the country's trade interests. This chamber believes that this situation is mostly caused by the actions of national agitators, and it respectfully requests His Majesty's government to take simplified measures against this incitement and restore the necessary tranquility for the prosperity of trade and for the good of Egypt in general. However, the events have proven that there was no real cause for such concern. Nevertheless, it was necessary to take exceptional precautions to maintain order, especially during the days of the Wardani incident. But the inhabitants of Egypt, of all classes, were carrying on their occupations and businesses in complete safety and security during those months.

There was much apprehension and reservation in England due to the long time that passed between the commission of the crime and the final judgment on the perpetrator. But after reconsidering all the circumstances of the case, I believe that justice was not delayed more than unnecessarily required for the killer. The preliminary investigation conducted by the Public Prosecutor with commendable speed, despite his obligation to examine the testimonies of no less than 110 witnesses to ascertain if Wardani had accomplices in his crime. Despite all this, and the complexity of the case, the Public Prosecutor's investigation was completed in 16 days. The case was then adjourned at the request of the defendants' lawyers. Nevertheless, the case was presented for review two months after the murder, which is a shorter period than the average time between the commission of a crime and the trial of the accused in Egypt. The average duration was 87 days in 1909, and it does not exceed the average duration in other European countries, where the average ranges from three to four months, and criminal cases in England often take longer than that.

As for the Mufti's opinion, it is given from the perspective of Islamic law. He is consulted before the death sentence is pronounced and is considered part of the usual official procedures. Fatwas are almost always in the form of attempts to evade atonement, and it is rare for the Mufti to be consulted before approving the death penalty. The Christian nationalists and their newspapers have greatly prolonged the issue due to the Mufti's fatwa against the death sentence in this case, but there was nothing unusual in this fatwa.

If we consider what happened in this case overall, we find it to be a good outcome for the Egyptian judiciary.

Text produced by OCR — report an error