It cannot solve the future. How can you say this is the promised, awaited, and hoped-for one? This is a problem that leads to contradiction and disbelief. This question applies to everyone who claims the Mahdiya. Therefore, the Sharia would have spoken of a meaning other than what is intended, and would have said: "Announce that the good news is false." Thus, it is inevitable that one must examine the attributes mentioned in the report and match them with the attributes of the Mahdi.

He begins to make this comparison, attribute by attribute, explaining the precision of the match by analyzing the hadiths concerning the Mahdi on one hand, and analyzing the descriptions of the Mahdi on the other, to conclude by declaring the reassured soul's conviction in the Mahdi and the disappearance of doubts, saying: "O reassured soul, yes, you have spoken the truth and been guided. I sought clarification from you, and you have excelled. Now, the truth has become clear.

It has become evident that Abu Abdullah Muhammad bin Abdullah, may God Almighty be pleased with him, is the Mahdi. The veil of doubt and suspicion has been lifted from him.

Since it has become clear to me that your statement is the truth, I proclaim with all my might: The Mahdi, Abu Abdullah Muhammad bin Abdullah Al-Fatimi, may God Almighty be pleased with him, is the one his grandfather, peace and blessings of God be upon him, prophesied. He is the first Imam and the absolute ruler, who was looked upon and hoped for.

From the analysis of this treatise, it is evident that the author's style is somewhat forced, often leading to weak argumentation, along with a heavy and awkward presentation. This suggests that the man may not have believed in the Mahdiya but adopted this approach and wrote this treatise to curry favor with the monotheists. Perhaps what he concluded his treatise with, the excessive praise for Abd al-Mu'min, and what he became of leadership in "Marsiya," and what he mentioned about him.