Sudan Archive

Open the original scan

OriginalTranslateMachine translation — not a source document

Tawriya is one of the rhetorical devices, but its use is rare. If it is strong, it is from the subtleties of their literature, as is the case with complete and incomplete homonyms, which have no meaning for them. The elegance of what is translated for them from Arabic, which is adorned with it, is lost, such as the saying of the author of Al-Badi'iyyah: From the omens and from the remembrance of Dhi Salam, the eye's brilliance in its beginning with blood. And from the people of piety, then the one that appears, the contradiction of the body from harm and from burning. And it is not possible to transfer to their language what I said in the system of modern terminology: My body is sound from excessive longing, muscular, and the tears are flowing from a continuous flow. My story has been hidden from people, all of them, until my weakness is followed by everyone who blames. The clouds are withheld from my eyes, and their sight, as if the rain is falling from them when it pours. I raised my case to the judge of love, but he refused and said, "I have no authority over this assembly." O heart, be patient with what is in you of ailments, and do not tighten and despair and leave boredom. And leave the remainder of what he has left of his grace, do not blame him for adding to those who blame. Thus, it appeared and is known by analogy, and his saying is denied, false, and not accepted. Until the end of my saying about it. The time is alive for him, it does not exceed it, and this is the way of a lover in love, all of it. And the completion of the speech on that is the same for me. In general, every language has its own terminology, and the terminology of the French language is to reduce conjugation as much as possible, and the conjugation of a verb with another verb, for example. If a person wants to inform that he ate, he says "the king ate," meaning "he ate." So it is not possible to conjugate "ate" in some of its states except with the verb "the king" or "he wore." It is as if he is saying, "I wore eating." And if he wants to say "I went out," he says "I am the one who went out," meaning "I went out," and so on. He calls the verb "the king" and the verb "to be" auxiliary verbs, meaning that they help in conjugating verbs and are stripped of their original meaning. And if he wants...

Text produced by OCR — report an error