Al-Riddif and, in summary, King Abdullah proved his loyalty to the Israelis and his enmity towards the Mujahideen. And perhaps God will grant victory so that these armies do not fall under the authority of Al-Sufyani, in which case terrible crimes will occur. From this perspective, we also see the Shabak between him and the aforementioned Al-Sufyani in the narrations. But what is Abdullah Al-Kani's justification for attacking Syria and then Iraq, if the United States occupied Iraq? Given the United States' ignominious defeat in occupying Iraq, it is almost certain that they will withdraw their forces from Iraq. But the leaders of the United States will, of course, not leave Iraq after the loss and having spent vast sums of money on the war. Therefore, they will save face and claim that they are withdrawing their American and British forces from Iraq in response to the will of the Iraqi people. But in reality, with malicious intent, they will install their agents in the region simultaneously with the withdrawal of their forces from Iraq to sow sedition or seize Iraq, under false pretenses of the oppression of the Sunnis in Iraq and the formation of the "Shiite Crescent." In response to this, they will overthrow the Iraqi government from within or without, indirectly, and while maintaining an international facade, they will control Iraq again. On this basis, it is likely that the apparent withdrawal of American forces from Iraq will lead to the beginning of King Abdullah Al-Kani's wars in Syria and Iraq. On this basis, the United States will occupy Iraq and Syria again, on the one hand, and maintain its international image, on the other hand.