The important point that we must emphasize is that the prophecies and the applications mentioned between King Abdullah Al-Kani and Al-Sufyani in the narrations are merely possibilities and not definitive. Therefore, one cannot overemphasize the congruence between King Abdullah and Al-Sufyani, and consequently, use them for timing the appearance.

As we mentioned, this article is the result of research using documents and sources, and the author's intention was never to create any kind of division among Muslim brothers in different countries. Rather, the sole objective behind this work is to warn about the suspicious movements of Western agents in the Middle East region, and to explain these movements according to the narrations about the End Times and the signs of the Hour. It is self-evident that this article, like all other research articles, is not definitive and may potentially be incorrect, and of course, this matter will become clear over time. Therefore, I ask my esteemed readers to view this work as research, not as a definitive statement, and to avoid issuing any kind of hasty judgments or actions in this regard. They should not view these applications as definitive, and most importantly, they should not set a time for the appearance, so that some do not resort to disbelieving the narrations of the End Times because of a delayed emergence from the time they set. Let us leave that to Allah, for He alone knows the unseen.

In reality, King Abdullah Al-Kani, in terms of age, is at the end of his youth and entering middle age, and he has ample time to carry out the movements we mentioned. And if he is Al-Sufyani, he does not know that he will carry out military movements in another year. Therefore, the discussion of the appearance of Imam Mahdi (peace be upon him) and the probability of linking what was raised in the article to the appearance is not subject to judgment.