When he said this, he was in fact immersed in isolation, when you do not pay attention to the events around you that affect the public interest of the masses, or when you are isolated from your surroundings to say what is beyond the interests of the masses. He said: "It is enough for me to say that the Sudanese army was more victorious against the enemies in battles, and in the battles of freedoms, and in the battles of democratic rights, and in the liberation of the homeland. The farmers, students, merchants, and men of religion also witnessed this. As for the Workers' Union becoming a traitor, this is absurdity. Rather, this is treason itself, if treason is something recognized or accepted. Treason is persistence in deviation despite its consequences for the homeland. If the Farmers' Union is the first to be called a traitor, then the traitor is the traitor. And if treason is the fulfillment of promises to the colonizers and their assistance, then the workers are the traitors. The people are the traitors, and the traitors are the colonizers, and the traitors are the Algerians, the Moroccans, and the Sudanese! And if treason is saying that the continuation of the agreement means the continuation of the occupation, and that the Sudanese people must be freed from the occupation and imposed on them. The agreement is based on its destruction. And the victory is, first and last, for the people and the future.